Family Structures

Family Structures

Family Structures

What Sociologists Study

According to OpenStax (2018), sociologists study group interactions, groups, social interactions, and societies, from personal to small groups to big groups. OpenStax writes that sociologists study all the levels and aspects of a society, a group of people living in a defined geographic place. Sociologists who work at the micro-level study individual interactions and small groups, whereas those at the micro-level analysis study trends between and among societies and large groups (OpenStax, 2018). Notably, a micro-level sociological study may study accepted conversational rules in different groups like adolescents, while a macro-level study may examine how family structures have changed in the United States.

How Family Structures Have Changed Over the Years to the Present Day

Family structures have changed over the years. According to Hammond, Cheney & Pearsey (2021), in the U.S. during the 1900s, many families had three generations living together, including grandparents, parents, and children. By 2012, only 4.6% of families had this type of structure in their household (Hammond, Cheney & Pearsey, 2021). Today, the nuclear family is the preferred family, having a father, mother, and children. The nuclear family has also evolved to include single-parent families, which may have been created by the death of a spouse, divorce, or unwed motherhood (Hammond, Cheney & Pearsey, 2021).

The current family structure also has a blended family, often created through remarriage, and includes step-siblings, step-parents, or both. According to Hammond, Cheney & Pearsey (2021), a family is considered an extended family if it exceeds the two-generation blended or nuclear family.

Another trend in the contemporary family structure is cohabitation. Cohabitation is a marriage pattern where a woman and a man share a residence and have a sexual relationship but are not married (OpenStax, 2018). In a traditional blended or nuclear family, couples had to be married to live together and have children. Now, 39% of the Pew Research Center’s research of 2010 stated that marriage is becoming obsolete and cohabitation more acceptable. In 2011, the cohabitation rate had increased by 13% since 2009 (OpenStax, 2018).

Furthermore, family structure in the 21st century has extended to include same-sex couples. In 2000, the U.S. Census Bureau reported 594,000 same-sex couples (OpenStax, 2018). Homosexuality has been embraced in households, breaking the simplicity of family structures that existed in the 1900s.

References

Hammond, R., Cheney, P., & Pearsey, R. (2021). Sociology of the Family.

OpenStax (2018). Introduction to Sociology 2e. Texas: Rice University.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 


http://freesociologybooks.com/Sociology_Of_The_Family/01_Changes_and_Definitions.php

*What do sociologists’ study?

Family Structures

Family Structures

* How have family structures changed over the years to the present day?

Please note reading is chapter one of the textbook. Thanks

Order Solution Now

Engagement/Assessment Techniques

Engagement/Assessment Techniques

Engagement/Assessment Techniques

The first technique I would apply to the initial meeting is ensuring that Tanya feels safe. Introducing the safety topic to children is essential as it would help them feel safe and know that their need has been identified. To introduce the safety topic, it would be essential to use a worry meter, which allows me to assess how worried or unsafe Tanya feels and then explore the issues that make her feel unsafe (Stiborova, 2020). I would also assess what makes Tanya feel safe and help her identify the difference between little and big worries. This will help establish trust and allow Tanya to express her fears and feelings openly and trustfully.

The second technique would be treating Tanya especially, ensuring she feels she is unique. This would mean using tools that can enable me to find out Tanya’s wishes and needs, identify her strengths, and build rapport with her. I would also find out what she likes, her thoughts and feelings about the future and current situation, and what she would like to see happen to her and her family.

The last technique would be to make the meeting fun. The environment I will meet her needs to be child-friendly and fun. I could use memory boxes to help with memorabilia and use the friendly map to gauge the level of safety that Tanya feels within the environment and make appropriate changes. Family is an integral part of the Hispanic culture. During the discussion, it would be essential to emphasize the value of family and try to find out any needs that Tanya might have within the family.

References

Stiborova, E. (2016-2020). 30+ tools for 1:1 work with children (assessment, planning & intervention). http://www.socialworkerstoolbox.com/30-tools-11-work-children-assessment-planning/

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 


https://egcc.instructure.com/courses/24038/files/5714488?wrap=1
https://egcc.instructure.com/courses/24038/files/5714537?wrap=1

Engagement/Assessment Techniques

Engagement/Assessment Techniques

Tanya is a 10-year-old Hispanic female whom her teacher referred to meet with the School Social Worker. Tanya’s teacher reported that Tanya often plays alone at recess and lunch and always seems nervous around the other children in her classroom. Tanya is reserved and feels anxious about meeting with the Social Worker.

Using the readings and the above vignette, please identify three engagement/assessment techniques you could apply to your initial meeting with Tanya. Please consider any cultural considerations.

Order Solution Now

Deviant Acts

Deviant Acts

Deviant Acts

Ranking deviant acts on a scale of 1 (least bad) to 10 (most deviant)

  1. Buying a DVD duplicate of a contraband theater film on the street.
  2. You are purchasing a PlayStation 5 and trying to resell it for twice the original expense.
  3. Illegally downloading a tune to play as a DJ, you would get compensated.
  4. You are stealing food from a grocery store to take care of your family.
  5. I was leaving a dog in a vehicle on a hot day.
  6. Coming to this country without proper documentation
  7. A doctor persuades patients to use a pharmaceutical for personal gain.
  8. You are using one’s status as CEO to control the progression of profits to your bank.
  9. You are murdering a man who is found to be guilty of the death of your child.
  10. A lady who sexually assaults a man at a party.

Most stigmatized norm violators and why they can’t escape the stigmatization.

A woman who sexually assaults a man will never get away from the stigma of being a sex offender. In our societies, sex offenders are the most condemned individuals. One principal reason is that sex offenders are known to be predators who prey on other people, using any opportunity they see to assault their victims sexually. Another reason is the reinforcement of these perspectives by depictions in the media and mainstream culture. Consequently, people are always on guard whenever they are around sex offenders, protecting themselves and those around them. Mandatory requirements for sex offenders to register themselves wherever they live also increase the stigmatization. According to the labeling theory, it increases the likeliness of the offender reoffending (Schultz 2014), which only serves to increase the stigma more.

Norm violators are most likely to continue violating and become secondary deviants if they are never caught.

If never caught, the woman committing sexual assault is most likely to continue violating and become a secondary deviant. Over the years, the recidivism rate of sex offenders has consistently been high, indicating that sex offenders are likely to re-offenreoffendVess et al., 2010). This also applies to a sex offender who has never been caught, and such a person might even offend more, committing more violent crimes since they believe they will get away with it every time.

References

Schultz, Carla (2014) “The Sti”matization of Individuals Convicted of Sex Offences: Labelling Theory and The Sex Registry,” Themis” Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science. Vol. 2, Article 4.

Vess, J., & Skelton, A. (2010). Sexual and violent recidivism by offender type and actuarial risk: ReoffendReoffendingor rapists, child molesters, and mixed-victim offenders. Psychol gy, Crime & Law, 16(7), 541-554.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 


Rank the following deviant acts on a scale of 1 (least bad) to 10 (most deviant) and respond to the questions at the end.

Deviant Acts

Deviant Acts

  • Stealing food from a grocery store to feed your family
  •  Illegally downloading a song to play as a DJ where you would get paid
  •  Killing a man who is found to be responsible for the death of your child
  •  A woman who sexually assaults a man at a party
  • Using one’s stone’s CEO to control the flow of profits to your own bank account
  • Buying a DV copy of a bootleg theater film on the street
  • Buying a PlayStation 5 and attempting to resell it for twice the original cost.
  • Coming to this country without proper documentation
  • Leaving a dog in a car on a hot day
  • A doctor who influences patients to use a pharmaceutical for personal benefit

Which of these norm violators would be least likely to escape any stigma associated with knowledge of their deviant act? Why?

Which of these norm violators, if never caught, would be most likely to continue violating this norm and transition from a label of primary to secondary deviant?

https://egcc.instructure.com/courses/21348/files/4928207?wrap=1

Order Solution Now