Final paper grading rubric is used as a guide for improving your draft 1.  Not all categories of the rubric will be used for this draft.  The grade shown will not be included in the calculation of your lab grade and is used as a guide.  Your final grade for these sections could be higher or lower based on your review and corrections.  Review the Paper section of the lab syllabus.

Practice upload two days before closing of the assignment will add two points to the final paper grade.

Rubric

Lab Final Paper 23Lab Final Paper 23CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle PageFormatted correctly with all required contents.3 to >2.0 ptsProficient2 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of required contents. Some contents missing or formatting issues0 ptsUnsatisfactoryTitle page missing3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitleConcisely explains major theme of the project. Title is original.3 to >2.0 ptsProficient2 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some contents missing or needs improvement of how it is stated.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryTitle missing3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstractOne paragraph. No more than 250 words.
Concisely states the objectives, methods, results and conclusions.10 to >7.0 ptsProficient7 to >0.0 ptsNeeds improvementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some contents missing or needs improvement of how it is stated.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryAbstract missing10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionThree paragraphs.

1. General background information about the topic that links to the specific objective(s) of the experiment. Citations in APA format.

2. Specific information about the enzyme tested.
Accurately presents the specific objective(s) of the experiment. Provides a very brief summary of the methods(s) used. Citations in APA format.

3. States null and alternative hypotheses. States a specific prediction for each plant tested.15 to >13.0 ptsProficient13 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some contents missing or needs improvement of how it is stated.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryIntroduction missing15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMaterials and MethodsGives enough details to allow for replication of each required protocol. Clearly states the positive control and experimental groups for each plant tested. Clearly states results of standardization experiments and any adjustments to mixing tables.

Links the four parts of the experiment so that the reader can see the purpose of each.

Correct use of citations in APA format.

Effectively organizes this section with subheadings for each protocol.15 to >13.0 ptsProficient13 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some contents missing or needs improvement of how it is stated.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMaterials and Methods missing15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResultsAll required graphs are presented.
Microsoft Excel is used to create graphs
Each graph opens with a quantitative summary of major trends.
Each graph has all required components.
Graphs are presented in the same order as the protocols in the Materials and Methods section.
Appendix section placed after Literature Cited section
All tables of raw data are presented in the same order as the graphs and have all required components.25 to >20.0 ptsProficient20 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some contents missing or needs improvement of how it is stated or presented.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryResults and Appendix sections missing25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussionTwo paragraphs

Interprets results. Supports conclusions using quantitative results as evidence. Relates quantitative results to structural changes to peroxidase. Citations in APA format.

Compares results to hypotheses stated in the Introduction. States whether hypotheses were accepted or rejected and why. Compares results to findings of other scientists (primary sources).15 to >13.0 ptsProficient13 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some contents missing or needs improvement of how it is stated.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDiscussion missing15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature CitedCitations follow APA format and are cited in the body of the paper. Required number of primary and tertiary sources.4 to >2.0 ptsProficient2 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some sources missing . Formatting issues.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo citations provided4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneralPaper is written in scientific style, direct and to the point. Chemical formulas accurate and formatted correctly.
Spelling and grammar are correct.
Sentence structure is accurate.
Correct use of active and passive voice.10 to >7.0 ptsProficient7 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds careful review of category statement. Some contents missing or needs improvement of how it is stated.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo paper submitted10 pts
Total Points: 100

assignment: 

By Sat 10/12: Reply to the claim from another student.

• Note that you are only responding to one other student, but are finding two reliable sources for their claim.
• Research the medical claim posted by another student. 
  • Choose a post that is not being researched by any students. Only if ALL other posts are already being researched can you choose the same one as another student to research.
  • Identify which claim you are researching by posting a response that says “I will research this”. 
• You will probably not find sources that address this product directly, so focus on the claim itself. For example, if the product is claiming that it will help keep you healthy because it contains “X”. Research “X” to find out what it does. 
• Find two reliable online source that has information to help you support or refute the medical claim about this product.  
  • Use the library guide on Evaluating Online Medical Information to explain why you think this source is reliable.  
  • Focus your evaluation on the site itself rather than the information.
  • Provide a link to each source.
• Summarize what you learned from each reliable source in 4 – 6 sentences.
  • Does the source support or refute the original claim? 
  • What information about the medical claim does the source provide?

Classmate:  

I found an article on naturalnews.com regarding the use of Ivermectin for treatment of covid19 patients. I believe this is a non reliable article because there are no sources listed for how the information about the product was obtained. It mentions experiments with the medication and there is no proof of anything. There is no contact information listed and just other links to the same type of articles are provided. 

The U.S. military, creator of the COVID VACCINE, already knew since 2016 that IVERMECTIN was the BEST product to use in the event of a pandemic – NaturalNews.comLinks to an external site.

If you need how much is an extra bag on Delta, understanding how much you will pay for extra luggage can help you plan your trip and avoid unnecessary expenses. Whether you’re flying domestically or internationally, Delta charges a variety of fees for extra bags based on several factors, including your route, ticket type, and the number of bags you plan to check.

Standard Baggage Allowances

For most Delta domestic and international flights, each passenger is allowed to check one or two bags, depending on the ticket class.

Extra Bag Fees on Delta

For travelers bringing more than the standard allowance, Delta charges for extra checked bags. The fees depend on whether you are traveling domestically or internationally.

Oversize and Overweight Baggage Fees

In addition to fees for extra bags, Delta charges for oversize and overweight luggage. If your checked bag exceeds weight and size limits, you will be subject to additional fees

Check Delta’s size and weight limits 

Avoid surprises at the airport by measuring and weighing your luggage at home. Make sure your bags meet Delta’s requirements to prevent additional overweight or oversized fees.

Conclusion

Delta Airlines charges for extra baggage based on the route, number of bags, and whether they are overweight or oversized. Fees can quickly add up, especially for travelers with more than two checked bags or those flying internationally. However, by prepaying for bags, leveraging Delta’s frequent flier program, and using Delta-branded credit cards, you can reduce or even eliminate these extra charges. 

Class Discussion Assignment

By 
Wed 10/9:  Complete your original post.

· Find a claim about a health product from a 
non-reliable source. 

· Be careful about linking to sites that may have malware or viruses on them. We are looking for un-reliable but safe sites.

· A good strategy for finding these sites are to do a search using Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, or other search engines. Work your way down the top sites until you find one of questionable reliability.

· Since you are focusing on products that are being sold, the seller’s website is a good link to use. Or, you could use any non-reliable site that encourages people to buy a specific product.

· What does this product do (or why are we supposed to want it)?

·
Summarize the claim in 2 – 4 sentences and provide a link to the original source.

· You are not evaluating their claims right now – just summarize what they are saying

·
Use the library guide on 

Evaluating Online Medical Information ChecklistLinks to an external site.
 to explain why you think this source is not reliable.

· Be sure to use multiple items from the checklist to support that this is not a reliable source

· Focus your evaluation on the source rather than the advice itself. Sources that aren’t reliable may have valid information, but we can’t be sure without doing more research.

The Eval. Checklist Below:

Evaluating Online Medical Information

There is an abundance of medical information on the internet. How do you know what to trust? In this guide you will find guidelines for evaluating online medical information. 

Look for recognized authorities.

· In general you can trust public institutions and learned societies, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the American Medical Association (AMA).​

· Websites ending in .gov or .edu are more reliable and trustworthy than .org or .com. You can use .org or .com sites, just take extra time to fully evaluate the website.

· Look at the “About Us” page. This page should tell you more about the creator of the content. Are they a government organization, non-profit, professional association, commercial organization, or an individual? An individual should list their qualifications and credentials. Try to determine a commercial website’s motivation.

· Check outside sources. What do they say about the resource you are looking at? Is there a Wikipedia page that can give you more information?

· Look for contact information. There should be a way to contact the organization or people who run the site.

Look for quality.

· What process does the content go through before it is shared? Is there an editorial process? Is the information reviewed? The editorial process might be on the “About Us” page or another page that is easy to locate. The page might say something like “review policy” or “selection policy.”

· Are the people who run the site or writing the information experts in their field? Look for medical experts with proper qualifications such as M.D. Ph.D. or specialized degree. You might find this information in a section called “About our board/advisors/writers/contributors.” Information should be transparent and easy to locate.

Be skeptical.

· Beware of “miracle cures,” dramatic breakthroughs, secret ingredients, and sensational claims. If something seems too good to be true it probably is.

· If you think what you are looking at might be valid, verify the information with other, reliable sources.

Look for evidence.

· Don’t trust sources that only offer opinions or testimonials.

· Look for citations, such as links to studies or a reference section. You should be able to tell the source of any original data or information.

Currency.

· How current is the information? Though science builds on past discoveries, you will want to find the most current up to date information.

· Look for dates on web pages such as when the information was published or last updated.

· Are there lots of broken links? If this is the case then the website may not be maintained or up to date.

Determine the purpose of the information.

· Is the site trying to sell you something or make a profit? 

· Who is funding the site? Is the funding public, private, supplied by donations, or through advertising.

· Advertising should be clearly labeled with a possible statement about ads and funding.

· Be aware of who is providing the information. If a drug company is supplying the information about their product, confirm the information from a source not associated with the company.

Other tips.

· Don’t provide personal information unless you fully understand what will be done with your information. Privacy policies should be clearly stated.

· Consult with a health professional if you are seeking advice or treatment about your own medical issue.

· Avoid getting information from social media unless the information is from a verified account of a trusted resource.

Suppose  you were to implement a program for juveniles.  What would your program  address and how would you go about starting this program? Your paper  should include the following sections: 

1.An abstract summary 

2.A statement of need or importance of the program supported by literature 

3.What your objectives would be. 

4.Your plan of action including: who will be involved and who are the partners that will be associated with your plans.  

5.What are the projected or anticipated outcomes?  

This assignment should be a minimum of  eight (8) pages double spaced, in APA format, and you should cite at  least eight (8) references to support your report.