Communication Dilemma

Explain how you would communicate this email and to whom you would report. Speculate the implications of ignoring the email and determine how this might impact investigating security incidents.

Are you interested in obtaining a new and fresh copy of “Communication Dilemma”? Place your order now.

The communication dilemma involved an incriminating email that was misdirected. The fact that the information was sent by mistake plays a key role. As an employee, the main action I would take is to report the case to the authorities. The action would create validated information that would adequately aid the collection of vital information to prosecute the involved parties (Kahan, 2017). Reporting the case to the manager is necessary because it is part of the protocol that needs to be observed.

On the other hand, ignoring the information might yield results that appeal appropriately to the concerned individuals. The ignorance may lead to a tort, affecting the company negatively. The law also allows the prosecution of such action under withholding information that led to crime in the company.

Similar Post: HIM 6320 Assignment 4

Reference

Kahan, D. M. (2017). Ignorance of the law is an excuse–but only for the virtuous. Michigan Law Review, 96(1), 127-154.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Communication Dilemma

Please respond to the following:

Communication Dilemma

As an employee, you receive an email that was misdirected. The email’s content implies that the email’s sender is involved in criminal behaviour involving your company.

1. Explain how you would communicate this email and to whom you would report. Speculate the implications of ignoring the email and determine how this might impact investigating security incidents.

• Interpret this situation from a security point of view and outline the process you would follow in collecting evidence while investigating this case.